Lorax, The
A fictional character that claims to speak for the silenced or unheard.
Essentially, a grifter.
A variety of allegedly altruistic ACTIVIST who pursues the interests of others over their own. They have ascribed themselves sainthood, looking after the downtrodden and marginalized. This renders them immune from criticisms of self-interest, albeit human motivations are often more complicated than they appear. What is it that compels someone to fight on another’s behalf rather than their own? It is often the case that those who speak for others end up far wealthier and more affluent than those they profess to speak on behalf of. What a strange outcome for those who claimed self-sacrifice over self-interest.
In the original story by Dr. Seuss, the Lorax speaks for the trees - immobile organisms absent a voice but who are ultimately an integral part of a complex ecosystem. This is a poignant message; however, trees are inadequate proxies for humans. In 1971, when the book was published, this was a far more relevant commentary. In the modern technological age, especially in the Western world, we have never been louder.
Many people are still in need to be sure, but who is better at advocating for our interests: us or someone else? It is tempting to permit others to speak for us, especially if we glean some benefits in the wake of their crusade. We are gaining advantage while contributing nothing ourselves; this is a good deal!
The fundamental issue with this concessional arrangement is that we have become a bystander in how we are perceived by others. Due to our implied support of the saint, we are reduced to a supporter, not an individual with their own mind and interests. We shall become associated with whatever the speaker proclaims, whether we like it or not. Our silence will be perceived by others as complicity for whatever our representative advocates. We are no longer autonomous; we are part of a collective.
While some may accept this strategy, it will not generally guide us towards a life defined by accomplishment and a sense of purpose - these have been co-opted by the Lorax. They will achieve notoriety and luxury while our hope and obedience is leveraged. If the Lorax is the only voice heard, then they will receive the spoils - they are not known to share.
If we can speak for ourselves, then we should never let another do so on our behalf. We are our best advocates, and if we do not believe ourselves capable, then we should find ways to improve.
No one has our best interests in mind but us.
No one should think or speak for us.
No one should be our Lorax.
Posted: 14 Mar 2023
